is someone playing with the granted credits?
30 Jan 2015 18:12:27 UTC
Topic 90945
(moderation:
| 1755809 | 720680 | 19 Jan 2015, 18:47:41 UTC | 24 Jan 2015, 14:01:11 UTC | Completed and validated | 28,884.03 | 2,904.54 | 76.94 | Binary Radio Pulsar Search (Perseus Arm Survey) v1.40 (BRP5-cuda32-nv270) |
| 1753796 | 717877 | 16 Jan 2015, 22:46:10 UTC | 22 Jan 2015, 20:28:37 UTC | Completed and validated | 26,068.53 | 2,903.87 | 15,007.82 | Binary Radio Pulsar Search (Perseus Arm Survey) v1.40 (BRP5-cuda32-nv270) |
| 1738703 | 715924 | 16 Jan 2015, 9:49:22 UTC | 19 Jan 2015, 18:47:40 UTC | Completed and validated | 40,824.58 | 2,962.23 | 15,119.54 | Binary Radio Pulsar Search (Perseus Arm Survey) v1.40 (BRP5-cuda32-nv270) |
| 1738675 | 715910 | 7 Jan 2015, 0:48:26 UTC | 16 Jan 2015, 22:46:08 UTC | Completed and validated | 41,188.45 | 2,910.75 | 6,002.46 | Binary Radio Pulsar Search (Perseus Arm Survey) v1.40 (BRP5-cuda32-nv270) |
Same application. roughly the same time, but the credits do not seem to be related to the computing time. It looks some kind of ... "funny".
--
Stephan
What you're seeing is the
)
What you're seeing is the result of the credit system tested here, it's called "Credit New" and the best description of it in it's current form is unstable or "random number generator".
For an extensive discussion about the tests please refer to this news thread and the 332 comments. Hopefully the tests can lead to a better credit system.